Editorial governance

Peer Review Process

LyJIT uses a structured peer-review workflow with a double-blind target (author and reviewer identities concealed during evaluation).

Workflow

1. Desk check — scope fit, template compliance (title, abstract 150–250 words, keywords, sections), and ethics screening.
2. Reviewer assignment — at least two independent reviewers with relevant expertise.
3. Evaluation — originality, soundness, clarity, reproducibility, and citation quality (IEEE or APA 7th with DOI URLs where available).
4. Decision — accept, minor/major revision, or reject. Revisions may be re-reviewed.
5. Production — copyedit, metadata, and Crossref DOI assignment readiness.

Status badges (author dashboard)

Published / Accepted In Review / Pending Rejected / Action Required

Access to submission

Manuscript submission and author dashboards require Google SSO only (Gmail / Google Workspace) via the LyndHub membership portal.